Maqsood v. State Of Haryana

TAPINDER SINGH MANN 2016.03.16 10:53 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Cr. Misc. M 2879 of 2016 Date of decision: 15.3.2016 Maqsood Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana Respondent

Present:

Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate.

Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana M.M.S.BEDI,J.

The petitioner has joined the investigation as per the instructions imparted by ASI Rakesh Kumar to the learned State counsel. He has not been attributed any specific injury to any of the police officials and having not been arrested from the spot at the time of the raid conducted by the police pertaining to gambling, the petitioner can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail.

The petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that the petitioner will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. The petitioner will not indulge in the similar activity, of which he is accused of, during pendency of the trial. March 15 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE