← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/9195/2021disposed of

Jatinder Roy Khattar v. Lakinderdeep Singh Bhaika And ORS

2024-07-30The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal3 pages

1 CWP Nos. 9195 & 13178 of 2021 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision: 30.07.2024    

     Jatinder Roy Khattar .....Petitioner versus Lakinderdeep Singh Bhaika and others .....Respondents    

      Rajinder Bhukkal, Advocate .....Petitioner versus Chairman, Election Tribunal of the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE Present :

Dr. Rau P.S.Girwar, Advocate with Ms. Archana Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No. 9195 of 2021 and for respondent No.4 in CWP No. 13178 of 2021.

Mr. Daman Jeet Bhoriwal, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No. 13178 of 2021.

Ms. Garima Pandey, Advocate for Mr. Anil Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ****

 !"#$ %&'# (% ) Both these petitions are disposed of by this order as common questions of law and facts are involved therein. However, for convenience, the facts are narrated from Civil Writ Petition No. 9195 of 2021. 2.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for the following substantial relief:-

2 CWP Nos. 9195 & 13178 of 2021 (O&M)  

   



 

   

     

  

   



            

   

    !

      

"  #         $

  %

 &  '&    

( 

 

   (

(     )

 

     * *    

  +

 !,  

   

 



  ' )     #  #   +

 

   

  

  

          

     #   

 

       !

    #    ,  

 -  

 $  

   

         "   

 

  +

 !, .   ( /    "

   +

 !,    

     

      )        !

  ' %

  &   ' &  $#

   

  ,  '

"$ #

  

 #  

"    $



  %

  &   ' & 



  

   

  )"  $



+

  $ *#   # 0 3.

The principal grievance of the petitioner in this petition is with regard to the fact that an ineligible person was elected as the President of the District Bar Association, Bathinda in the year 2021 but as the elections were not conducted subsequently due to Covid-19 pandemic, the same President of the Bar continued to hold the office.

4.

The Bench is informed that the elections of the District Bar Association, Bathinda, after the Covid-19 pandemic, have been held twice and the President as well as the other office bearers have since been appointed.

3 CWP Nos. 9195 & 13178 of 2021 (O&M) 5.

In view of the above subsequent developments, the cause raised in the petitions has become infructuous. However, this Court hastens to add that the legality and validity of the allegations of the ineligibility of respondent No.1 have not been acknowledged.

(SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE 30.07.2024 ravinder Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable √Yes/No