Sonu v. Ut Of Chandigarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 28006 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- August 08, 2017 Sonu

...Petitioner

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Bawa Mandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ashima Mor, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh. *** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be allowed to withdraw the petition, though he has prayed that a direction be issued to the trial Court for expeditious trial. Expeditious trial is right of every litigant. Therefore, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, a direction is issued to the trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously by giving short adjournments.

Learned State counsel has been directed to ensure that the prosecution witnesses are produced in the trial Court on the dates so fixed by the trial Court.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE August 08, 2017 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2017.08.09 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh