Raj Kumar v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-28878 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-28878 of 2016 Date of Decision: 30.08.2016 Raj Kumar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. M.K.Taya, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) This is the third application by the petitioner seeking regular bail in FIR No. 143 dated 27.4.2016 registered at Police Station Butana, District Karnal under Sections 406, 420, 498-A, 323, 377, 294, 506, 34 IPC. The first application was withdrawn on 12.7.2016. The second application was also withdrawn after the submissions were complete on 3.8.2016. Two weeks later, the petitioner has approached this Court with this application.

Mr. M.K.Taya, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed the power of attorney. The petitioner is in custody since 11.5.2016. Charge has been framed and only one witness has been examined. It is a matrimonial dispute. The petitioner is accused of burning his wife with an electric iron. State counsel had shown the filthy language used by the Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.09.06 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-28878 of 2016 -2petitioner while addressing his wife. There is a recorded conversation. The complainant side has received threatening calls. A complaint in this regard has been given to the police on 24.8.2016. The complainant has not been examined yet.

No case for bail is made out.

Petition is dismissed.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE August 30, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.09.06 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh