Inderjit Singh @ Navi v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-28104-2017 Date of decision:03.08.2017 Inderjit Singh @ Navi ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. GS Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

In the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for issuance of a direction to respondents No. 1 and 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 3 to 6, who are time and again harassing the petitioner by taking him into their illegal custody and threatening him to implicate in some false criminal case. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners at the very outset contends that the purpose of the instant petition would be achieved, if respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, is directed to decide the representation dated 27.07.2017 (Annexure P-3) moved by the petitioner. 3.

In view of the above, respondent No. 2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, is directed to look into the matter and decide the representation dated 27.07.2017 (Annexure P-3), moved by the petitioner in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to him, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4.

The instant petition stands disposed of, accordingly. August 03, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2017.08.03 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document