Amarjit Singh v. Mehar Singh

RSA-1538-2000(O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (224) RSA-1538-2000(O&M) Date of Decision:-24.03.2026 Amarjit Singh and Another ......Appellants

Versus

Mehar Singh and Another ......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

None for the appellants.

Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1.

A perusal of the case file reveals that on the last two consecutive dates of hearing, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he had no instructions from the clients. Even today, there is no representation on their behalf.

2.

In the aforesaid circumstances, it is apparent that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending on the docket for an indefinite period.

3.

It, therefore, appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the present appeal.

4.

Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.

SHUBHAM 2026.03.25 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order -1-

RSA-1538-2000(O&M) 5.

However, liberty is granted to the appellants to seek restoration of the appeal in accordance with law, in case sufficient cause is shown.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 24.03.2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No SHUBHAM 2026.03.25 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order -2-