Heena And ORS. v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-28125-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-28125 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 04, 2017 Heena and others ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Gulzar Mohd., Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. V.G.Jauhar, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No. 170 dated 22.11.2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 306 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar.

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioners have joined the investigation which is still in progress but their custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order dated 03.08.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, Jyoti 2017.10.04 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-28125-2017 -2subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) October 04, 2017 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.10.04 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document