Upkar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-15205 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 09, 2019 Upkar

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Baldev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.469 dated 14.10.2017 under Sections 323, 325, 506 and 302 IPC, registered at Police Station Pataudi, District Gurugram.

Notice of motion.

Mr.Navdeep Singh, AAG, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. The perusal of the record shows that there is only one accused i.e. present petitioner, who was armed with danda. He gave injuries to Phoolmala, wife of the complainant, who died. The case is stated to be at VINEET GULATI 2019.04.10 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh initial stage as only doctor has been examined. If the petitioner is released

CRM No.M-15205 of 2019 -2on bail, there is every chance of tampering with the evidence. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, I do not find it a fit case where petitioner is entitled to benefit of regular bail.

Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

April 09, 2019 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2019.04.10 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh