Rahul @ Tinku v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-28161-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28161-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 28, 2015 Rahul @ Tinku .....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Rahul Vats, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Kuldeep Tiwari, Addl.A.G.Haryana.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 439, Cr.P.C., is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, Rahul @ Tinku, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 186, 302, 307, 332, 353, 379, 392, 411 and 420 IPC, read with Section 34, IPC, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, in a case arising out of FIR No.228, dated 05.07.2013, registered at Police Station, Sampla, District Rohtak.

MEENU 2015.09.01 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-28161-2015 (O&M) -2After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the material available on record, this Court finds that the bullet recovered from the body of Harvinder Singhinjured matched with the firearm recovered from the petitioner; the injured -witness has appeared before learned trial Court and deposed against the petitioner; Except two all the 28 prosecution witnesses have been examined and that the case is at the fag end of trial.

No ground for grant of bail to the petitioner is made out.

Dismissed.

August 28, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.09.01 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh