Deepak @ Bablu v. State Of Haryana And Another
!"#$%"&'('#) *+ ,+
-./
0"1(2( 3
4/+3 - 55555
! "
#
"$ % & !
"'&( ! )'&
*' ! +
55555
- ++ 1 6
,-,!
#$.' $!
/0 + 1 23 3 $ !
!!
' 5 ' "
22 26 6 6 !0
7 "
28 7 " ( 7, ( 7 (
5 !
&& :
3 32
!-$ -
!
" # $ % %
& ' ()# * % + ,-. #!/01 1) #1#! 0#0 0#(!(2 !(3-*4 ' 0#5-*6 ' * *% 7
#1 #1#04
8#6 7 & # -
+ 9& * #/ 1( #1#0
7
& *7 * 7 : 7 7 &-
+ 9& *7 *7
7 4 6
&7 -
+ 9& *: !) #1#0 ;
''
!&7 !;' $
(
32 5
- #
<7' !-:
7 !/ #1#0 - + < 46 " 7 %=> ' #' 7 ' ' *
46 " 7 '-
2 %=> ?' @ !/ @ *%
46 %=> ' '- %=> '
46 '- ,-. ##(#2 #1##
0#0(5# 51/7' 0( - *!)/14 -*6 '
* %=> '
;
= ' ! + &
! ! $ &&
5
/0
$subsequent thereto against the petitioner is quashed. 5.
Similarly, learned State counsel has stated no objection in case the FIR is quashed based upon the compromise :
0
7' !
!',$ '$
!
! $'$& 5,
97'
!"# $%
&''()* +
+ , - - ")% -"
.)
/-
- ") ")0..
)# /'$ 1 $ .
"
!- & $ !&
5, 7' 7' 46 79 ()#* 7 * ' 0#1 *
4 6
777
46 & 7 8 7 %+ ?
6 7 77
%
46 & 7 8
%
46 ' ()# * * : 7
- *8* *7 + ,-. 012 ,-. * : 7 :
9 9 7 4 6 ' 8 * 7
9
' 8
7
46 @ + ,-. A
7 * + 7 7 7 < ' #
$ -
! '& 7'!
! ' '>647
.'
/0: 46 &
7 8 !"# 2 4 6 46 & 46 & 46
8 46 * 9 7
7 .'
,
- /0+ 1 23 3 $ !
!!
' 5 ' "
22 26 6 6 !
0
7 "
280 7 "(7,
( 7 (
5! &&
:
$$
!&
5, .'
+
- 267*8
&
?
#$> @ >+ ?
5 @ >+