Raj Paul Vig v. State Ofhy.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No.750-2004 Date of decision: 17.02.2025 R.P. Vig ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , J (ORAL) Petitioner was appearing in person in the present case. Today, none has put in appearance on his behalf.

It is noticed that on the last date of hearing i.e 03.10.2024, since no one had turned up for the petitioner, notice was issued to the petitioner. As per office report, petitioner has since expired. No LRs of the petitioner have come forward to seek the claim. It appears that LRs having lost interest, may not be interested in pursuing the present petition any longer. Dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is reserved to the LRs of the petitioner to seek revival of the present petition, in case any cause survives.

February 17, 2025 (VINOD S BHARDWAJ) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.02.18 21:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order