Kuldeep Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others
!"#$%&#'()($*+ , , -./&##0-.1!2 ,,,#"("($*#2 3), 4"!"#$%!25!*!!*&$"6#2) ,,,#)0$*&#*") + 78,4 4
!
" # $$$$$$$ 4 9, 8 % & ' ))*+)), - &
' .
/ .
0# 0# )0)* 12 3%#4 " # ' !
4 (
. 4 4 ( 5
'
.
!!
!. 12 3%#4 .
'
!
.
4 (
. 4 ) 7 .
( 5 6. 4
8 1 8:4
!
' .
!!!
( ; < )# 0= )0)=
62 6. 4
8
> ( !
! ? )0)= ' >.
.. !
! 0@ 0@ )0)= 12 3A4
.
62 6. 4
8
- !
8 ( !.
!B
! > )* %) )0)A 12 3C4
! ' 9< :
!
-
!
! !!!
!.
#
'
" # (!
'
+.
%% 0# )0)*
.
.
0C
(
,,
- 4
)0%* > 0# 0) )0)* 62 6.
8
- 8. ;
8 ' !
! & .. ..
( .. !.
!( 5 .. )% 0% )0)* ' (!.
( 2 ' +! !
.
.
'
2 ' 2 '
'
( !! ' ! ' >
.! -
! .
= ( '
.! ' .
!
! (
! 2. .
B
'
.!
!
'
! D !
.
!
- . (.
' ' ! (
/! ! ' '3?.
Union of India Vs. S.L. Abbas, (1993) 4 SCC 357 .
? ?
'.
( .
E
!
" #
#
F * <
'3?.
State of U.P. and others Vs. Gobardhan Lal, (2004)11 SCC 402, ' .
?
'.
$% !
Transfer of an employee is not only an incident inherent in the terms of appointment but also implicit as an essential condition of service in the absence of any specific indication to the contra in the law governing or conditions of service. Unless the order of transfer is shown to be an outcome of a mala fide exercise of power or violative of any statutory provision (an Act or Rule) or passed by an authority not competent to do so, an order of transfer cannot lightly be interfered with as a matter of course or routine for any or every type of grievance sought to be made. &
(
"
#
) *
#
**
'
This is for the reason that Courts or Tribunals cannot substitute their own
decisions in the matter of transfer for that of competent authorities of the State and even allegations of mala fides when made must be such as to inspire confidence in the Court or are based on concrete materials and ought not to be entertained on the mere making of it or on consideration borne out of conjectures or surprises and except for strong and convincing reasons, no interference could ordinarily be made with an order of transfer.+ 1!
4 ,
.
.!
Union of India Vs. N.P. Thomas, (1993) 6 Supp (1) SCC 704 N.K. Singh Vs. Union of India, (1994) 6 SCC
Pubi Lombi Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and others, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 279.
&
( . 2 2 ' ))* - &
. ! @ .
!
14
:4 ;
%# 0# )0)*
G .+ H+" G
H+"