Sahid & ANR v. State Of Haryana




    
     

 Date of decision: 30th October, 2015  Sahid and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondent     !"  #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. M.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.

 #
$% "& Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners Sahid and Rashid in case FIR No.553 dated 02.10.2014 registered at Police Station Hodal, District Palwal under Sections 147/148/323/324/506/326 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in consequence of the orders of interim bail dated 24.08.2015 passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined investigations which is not controverted by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Malkhan Singh who submits that the petitioners are no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from them and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.02 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



  In the light of what has been stated above, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 24.08.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioners will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly. %  #
&   '()*+ $


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.02 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court