Sunita v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-29321 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-29321 of 2016 Date of Decision: 05.12.2016 Sunita ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. S.S.Duhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 226 dated 3.6.2016, registered under Sections 304-B, 34 IPC, Police Station Model Town Rewari, District Rewari.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 24.8.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 24.8.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.05 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-29321 of 2016 -2the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 05, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.05 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh