The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Pure Drinks

205-2 IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH ITA-64-2001 (O&M Date of Decision: 10.09.20 X . . . . Appell CHANDIGA M) THE COMM MISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ant Vs.

DRINKS M/S PURE . . . . Responde nts **** HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA

CORAM:

ANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ANJAY VASHISTH **** None.

Present

**** PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Ora SANJEEV al) parties were informed by the Re

1. The p gistry time and again to take ste eps for re construction of the file but no ste eps have been taken.

2. The fi file is stated to have been fully bu urnt in the fire incident which to ook place in the Registry.

3. In vie ew thereof, the ITA is dismissed for non-prosecution.

4. All pe ending applications also stand di isposed of accordingly.

(SA NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA A) JUDGE (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE September 10, 2024 Mohit goyal Yes/No Yes/No

1. Whe

2. Whe ether speaking/reasoned?

ether reportable?

MOHIT GOYAL 2024.09.10 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document