High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/28515/2014disposed of

Mohd. Nadeem v. State Of Haryana & ANR

2015-08-17Mr. Justice T.H.B. Chalapathi2 pages

Crl.Misc. No.M-28515 of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl.Misc. No.M-28515 of 2014 Date of Decision : 17.8.2015 Mohd. Nadeem ......Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and another ......Respondents ...

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ...

Present :

Mr. Sarfraj Hussan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.K. Sangwan, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Pardeep Singh Poonia, Advocate for respondent no.2. ...

1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

2. Whether the judgement should be reported in Digest ? RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J Petitioner, by way of instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeks quashing of FIR No.753 dated 30.9.2013 under Sections 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 registered at Police Station I & P, Sushant Lok, Gurgaon.

Notice of motion was issued and pursuant thereto, reply was filed on behalf of the State.

Separate reply was filed on behalf of the complainant. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Ram Bhagat, Police Station I & P, Sushant Lok, Gurgaon, referring to the averments taken in the preliminary submissions of the reply filed on behalf of the State submits that since the petitioner has compounded the offence by depositing the outstanding amount of Rs.3,06,607/-, calculated by the complainant GREESH SAHNI 2015.08.19 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl.Misc. No.M-28515 of 2014 department-respondent no.2 vide receipt no.18838361 dated 13.6.2014 and thereafter competent officer of the complainant-department requested the S.H.O., Police Station I & P, Sushant Lok, Gurgaon, vide memo No.979 dated 24.6.2014 that no further action is required to be taken in the impugned FIR, present petition does not survive and the same may be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous.

Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner also fairly states that let the present petition be disposed of in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State.

Disposed of, accordingly. However, it is made clear that petitioner shall be at liberty to pursue his other remedies, if he is entitled, in accordance with law.

17.8.2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE GREESH SAHNI 2015.08.19 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh