Sukhbir Singh & ANR v. State Of Punjab




    
    

 Date of decision: 14th July, 2015  Sukhbir Singh and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

Respondent      !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab with ASI Gurmeet Singh, Police Station Makhu.

None for the complainant.

 "
#$ !% Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.123 dated 02.07.2014 registered at Police Station Makhu, District Ferozepur under Sections 326/323/324/148/149 IPC. Vide order dated 22.08.2014 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioners were granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.14 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Gurmeet Singh, Police Station Makhu, District Ferozepur submits that the petitioners have since joined the investigation and are no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from them and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute.

In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 22.08.2014 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioners will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly. $ &'()((*"+,-)% ./-( .01

#

  RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.14 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court