Mahi Lal @ Mahi Ram v. Ssp Fazilka & ANR.

CRM-M-28443-2015 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28443-2015 (O&M).

Decided on: August 31, 2015.

Mahi Lal @ Mahi Ram .. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

S.S.P, Fazilka and another .. Respondent(s) * * *

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.Vikas Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for a direction to the respondents to take necessary action in complaint dated 27.5.2015, Annexure P7 for lodging a criminal prosecution by registering an FIR against the daughter-in-law of the petitioner. It is apparent that the police has already presented a calendra under Section 66 of the Police Act, 2007.

I have heard the counsel for the petitioner and gone through Annexure P7.

Notice of motion to the Advocate General, Punjab. On asking of the Court, notice has been accepted by Ms.Harpreet Kaur Athwal, DAG., Punjab, present in the Court copy given.

Without expression of any opinion whether any

CRM-M-28443-2015 (O&M) cognizable offence is made out or the circumstances warrant registration of FIR in view of the action having already been taken under Section 66 of the Police Act, 2007, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka to consider Annexure P7, taking into consideration the relevant legal provisions applicable in the facts and circumstances of this case and dispose of Annexure P7 within a period of three months after the receipt of a certified copy of the order.

(M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 31, 2015.

rka RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2015.09.02 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document