← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/15342/2020disposed of

Bikramjit Singh @ Vicky v. State Of Punjab

2020-06-16Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur2 pages

CRM-M-15342-2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15342-2020 Date of Decision:June 16, 2020 Bikramjit Singh alias Vicky .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.Rahi Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.H.S.Grewal, Addl.AG, Punjab.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) The present petition is filed under Section 438 CR.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.20 dated 29.02.2020, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 380, 452 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sarai Amant Khan, Tarn Taran.

Issue notice of motion.

Mr.H.S.Grewal, Addl.A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State.

Heard.

It is not disputed that there was delay in registering the FIR and the main accused to whom Section 380 IPC is attributed, has since been released on bail.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to join the investigation and on his doing so, he be MEENU 2020.06.16 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-15342-2020 -2released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall continue to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. In case, the petitioner does not join the investigation or do not cooperate in the investigation, the respondent/State shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of his anticipatory bail. June 16, 2020 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2020.06.16 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh