Manpreet Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Others
! " # " $$$$
&'()* " &"+ ,
) -.
)/ 0!1)
" .
" . 2
)
%3 &
!"# #
$
%
'
( '
)
" * &
+, '
( '
)
'
& - .'+ '
"/0/"/"- '
1) 2
+'
#
&& )2 2 4 , )45
*67 0"( /(/8"/"" )
# ',
-/"6 #0"/.6 #+ *6+ )
.
) ,
+
) & '.
)9
: "/0!+ +
+
; '
) + /0/8"/"" # <
6 + '
/ /8"/"" +
&
& +
& ; + ) .
;
' )' )
) ; 6 + )'
&+
, 9&
):
) &1 )
$
) '
+
'
)
)
& , )+ ;
&7 "
)+ ) ' #
-/" 6 # , )
2
.
2
+ = >0<=
#+ & '
&& & , )+
'+
&) 8 %
) & >0
&
&'
2 2 4,
+ ) ' + )
) ( 6
&
; ! The issue regarding the scope and extent of power of the court to arraign any person as an accused during the course of inquiry or trial in exercise
"
of the power under section 319 Cr.P.C. has been set at rest by a Constitutional Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hardeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2014
(1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 623 followed by another pronouncement in Babubhai Bhimabhai Bokhiria and Another Vs. State of Gujarat and others, 2014 (2) RCR (Criminal) (SC) 915.
9.
After reviewing various precedents, Hon'ble Apex Court summarized the legal position in Hardeep Singh's case (cited supra) in the following words: ??
+
#
' =
' +
=
) '
+
&
6 =
1)
& ' ) '
)
@ '+
)
&
+ =
& + )
&
'
# A=
B & ) &
'
'
+
&
=
)
=
) +
6
&=
) +
#?? 0/ )
'
#
. < ? &# .
.
.
;
?
9
:
??
-03
#
+
+
+ )
'
'= '
) '
)
@ )
;
) +
-03
# # )
)&
+
)
;
)
-03
# & )??
00 2 + )
*6+
-
)
.
),
+
; + &
) D.
'+
+
&
) '+
6 *6 & ' &+
'
,
5 0" &)
&
2
+
080 # # +
)
) 0- , )
>0D 2
/ /("/"-9= ":+
!"#
$% & %
%
%' ( ) *
+,- # %
( % . )&*
( ! $ % ( %/ % (
$ /% 0 !,1 +++%
2
3 % % +++ 0 % ! $% +++2
!
"
# !$
"
!! % " "
! &
!$
"
"
!
! .
$ %
/ ,6,+
# % %% $
% & $ % % ++ +++ %78
,6 9, $%
# $ %%
+6 9, ( /% ::(
% $ ( :
#
0 %
,;2
2 %
30 < 0 &
'
2
& '+
' '
)+
)
E ;
D .
+A
+ '
'
)+
) )
'+
&7 "
'
1)2
&
'
&
=
)
=
) +
6
B
&=
) +
# 0$ *
'
>0 2 & )
#
'
+ '
1)2
+'
# , - 2 '" . * " > ;
)E FE7
> FE7
$