Digamber Singh v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

CRM-M-31358-2013 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31358-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 14, 2015 Digamber Singh ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.J.S.Bedi, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Diya Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Kuldeep Tiwari, Addl.A.G.Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr.I.S.Saggu, Advocate for respondent No.2.

.........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned senior counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition enabling the petitioner to file criminal revision petition impugning the order of framing of charges, at first instance.

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection MEENU 2015.09.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-31358-2013 (O&M) -2to the above prayer.

Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Since it has been pointed out that three different FIRs of similar nature were registered against the petitioner and the charge-sheets (reports under Section 173, Cr.P.C.) have been presented in all the three cases, which are being tried simultaneously by learned trial Court, therefore, three criminal revision petitions, to be filed by the petitioner arising out of the said FIRs, shall be decided by the Court of Session simultaneously.

September 14, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.09.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh