Amarjit Kaur v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-29621-2018 Date of decision: 18.07.2018 Amarjit Kaur ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. SS Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

In the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2018 (Annexure P-2) and to reinvestigate the case FIR No. 96 dated 30.04.2018 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Nathana, District Bathinda. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset contends that the purpose of the instant petition would be achieved, if respondent No. 1-Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda, is directed to decide representation Annexure P-2, moved by the petitioner. 3.

In view of the above, respondent No. 1-Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda, is directed to look into the matter and decide complaint Annexure P-2, moved by the petitioner, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to her, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4.

The instant petition stands disposed of, accordingly. July 18, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2018.07.19 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document