Vijay Kumar Garg v. Bharti Garg & ANR

CRM-M-28738-2014 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28738-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 08, 2015 Vijay Kumar Garg .....Petitioner

Versus

Bharti Garg and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

None for respondent No.1.

Mr.Kapil Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

......

Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the interim directions issued vide order, dated 27.08.2014, by this Court, the petitioner did appear before the Court below and was admitted to ad interim bail. In support of his contention he has placed on record certified copy of the order, dated 30.08.2014, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Guhla, which is taken on record.

MEENU 2015.01.09 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-28738-2014 (O&M) -2Perusal of the said order reflects that the petitioner did appear before the Court below and was admitted to interim bail. Learned counsel further contends that the petitioner is continuously appearing before the Court below. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Sahib Singh of Police Station, Cheeka, has not controverted the above submissions.

In spite of service, the complainant has not appeared in this case.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the State, the interim directions issued vide order, dated 27.08.2014, are made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to appear before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing unless order otherwise. January 08, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.01.09 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh