Shimpy Baghla @ Saurav Baghla v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 290 Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-28765 of 2017 (O & M) Date of Decision: August 17, 2017 Shimpy Baghla @ Saurav Baghla ..... PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Senior Advocate, with Mr. H.S. Deol, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

. . .

Jaspal Singh, J 1.

This is a third petition preferred by petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail in case FIR No.03 dated January 08, 2015 under Sections 364, 302, 382, 34 IPC registered at Police Station, Thermal (SGN Dev. TRML Plant), District Bathinda.

2.

Earlier, petitioner filed two petitions viz. CRM No.M-41827 of 2015 and CRM No.M-24495 of 2016 which were dismissed as withdrawn after arguing the matter vide orders dated February 16, 2016 and August 08, 2016, respectively. The instant petition being the third petition having been filed on the same cause of action itself is not maintainable as no fresh argument has been raised. Moreover, petitioner alongwith his co-accused has Avin Kumar 2017.09.28 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No.M-28765 of 2017 [2] been attributed extortion of motor cycle, mobile phone and murder of Prabhdeep Singh in connivance with each other. Allegations against the petitioner are serious and grave.

3.

Keeping in view the gravity of offence, this Court is of the considered view that it is not a fit case to grant concession of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed. (Jaspal Singh) August 17, 2017 Judge avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No Avin Kumar 2017.09.28 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document