Manoj Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-7918-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7918-2026 Date of decision:16.03.2026 Manoj Kumar .....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present :

Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. AG, Haryana-State.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant extension to the employees after completion of service contrary to Rule 30 of the Punjab Waqf Regulations, 1996 as well as the law laid down by various Court, regarding which legal notice dated 16.03.2025 (P-3) was also served upon respondents-authorities, but the respondent-authorities are not taking required action and acting against the settled proposition of law. Further it is prayed that during the pendency of the present petition, respondents may be restrained from granting extension to any employee after his/her retirement, in the present case.

PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.20 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-7918-2026 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.

3.

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

4.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 16.03.2026 Puneet Chawla Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. :

Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.03.20 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document