Satto v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-29646 of 2016 Date of Decision: 30.08.2016 Satto .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) After completing his submissions, when the Court was not inclined to grant bail, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE August 30, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.30 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh