Yusuf Kalyan v. State Of Punjab



IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH
 ,, -.

./

2  345 5

,+$$, ,,

 

$$$55 1
01

  



$$$ 63 

 


 (

 !"# $ %&'(
#   (

!

' Mr.


+',
%&



))  )




- .
!'
!
$ $%/
,

!

' ) %$


* *+ ,,
%

'

)
 $ *

.

  

%0
 "

 6

  ,, -./
1

)


 


)

!










"
3%0
 7
) 


  

 
 


 


 




4-
#
5


2"


 
! 

"





#$!
%



 
!
$&
#   
'

)

 




)

*
  1
)
)

 
 


)


 










)

 
  
*) ) 



1
) 
'



*) 


'

'



 



& 1

,

)


.'




)  



)  

* *

'
&
&
'
 
 9'



 
8






)

* *

'


' 

))
)  
) 

!  


8 





*) 


 





:
!

'

& 
 


) 

 


)
'
& 
.'




)





 




&
 
)) 



  1

'
 




)

*

8 


 


) 

 


* 4
&





)

  


 
&
 



* 
) 

  ;
&

  




 



 


)



&

)



) 




*



 
) 

!  
 
 


)



 




*

)

* *

4
*



) 


*)

 

"

*
*


  


 



'

'



) 

 * 1



, *


8
 
  

*
 

 

)  

)

* 


 

!

!






*


) 

*
)9
1 
*
&

  
*
*

*

 

&  '(()* +', ,$%  

          

  !" #

 "

"$$%

*

& 

 -.-

/#  !* 0+1 23*4 5)"% 66 6-   

    $ *0+)'$% 7

 

 3

 '('(1'4*1*   4"" %& 2-  -

 # 82 1#934'(,1)4*1:   4$$% 7

  3

      '(" 1!4 * * 1*  4 ,,(% #;    6  <

=  5"*0+ +"$)%& 

  ,) *0+ $, ,%.- &2

/ /#  % !*0+ 5)" #    -<

  ,,*0+ +")
%



* 
) 

 

'

 


)

<*

)






& 
 

2=

"
 

   
' 



)
'

'
 &
  .
&


 



 

)

* 

*

2

2(

%

)



 '


 




) ) 

)

*


 
 
 
* 
)) 
 


)

  

'
 
* 

 

'


)&  



0 
)
  
  
' 
' 

& 
 

)&

!

7


-  


 



)


)
Rohit Kumar Vs. State e of Delhi : 2008 Crl. J. 2561.
9.

Further, a perusal of order dat ted 02.03.2015 reveals that when n the matter wa as taken up on that date, the e proclamation was received b back executed, however, since the period of 3 30 days had not elapsed, the ma atter was adjou urned to 23.04.2015 awaiting the appearance of the petitio oner.

However, while adjourning the case to 2 23.04.2015, the trial Court faile d to consider th he fact that 
 

&
0 

*

*) 
, 

 


 


)

*
'
 


) 
 

) 
'
  

) 

)

*


) 
) 


'

'


(2

-




0


* 

& 2- 

 -

# 821#934 34 '(,1)4*1:  4$ $$



)


 *


&
) 
  & 
 

)

*
'

 
&

*
) 
)




'
 
&



' 

) 
'
))



%
)
!  

3 7





)  

)

*

 


)




*
) 
)




'

&



'  


 
 
>



*



0

 *

)  
)




* 

' 




  



*
) 
) 

  
'

&



 


)

 
)

*



0 

*
) 
)
 

  
1




37 3 7

!
3 737





, &


, &
'  
*


' 


& & 
)  


)

*
 




*

)  

)&
-  





) 
)
Pawan Kumar Gupta a Vs.

of W.B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368.
The State

%

 

&'


  

*
&

  

&'

 


'


'

&



) 
)


'


*)
 


"
3%0
 7
)


 

 
 


 


 
  



4-
# #
5

2"

 

!


"





#$ $!
% 

 
!
$& 

+

#



'

) 






)

* *

 

'




) 

*

8'&

)

  




 


'

)


' .
, 



 

 ) 



)


) 


 

! 


+#!!

4

 




 

 )



  

)



 
 

*

,  
, 






 



)


 




 
'
'

# 

&





)) 

 
 
 




 
 




 



 
)


*
0)  





 



 

0)


) )

*



 

  
 


)
 

*

1


)) 


) 








*


4

*






)
 

))
 


 
'

)


' .
*


)



*


* (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ,+$$,,


Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No