Punit Kumar v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-29747 of 2018 Date of Decision: 20.12.2018 Punit Kumar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Amit Khatkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

None for respondent No. 2.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 66 dated 15.2.2018, registered under Sections 354-A, 354-D IPC, Police Station Urban Estate, District Rohtak. Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 18.7.2018, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 18.7.2018 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 20, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.12.20 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh