← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/28771/2015dismissed

Gurdeep Kaur @ Deepi v. State Of Punjab

2015-09-03Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM No.M-28771 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 03, 2015 Gurdeep Kaur alias Deepi

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Rajiv Vij, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.58 dated 22.05.2014 under Sections 301, 201 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Bhagwantpura, District Roopnagar.

Notice of motion.

Mr.B.S.Bhullar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and contests the petition.

Police record is also available.

At the time of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that due to typographical mistake, Section 301 IPC has been written instead of Section 302 IPC and requested to correct it. As it is a typographical mistake only, therefore, the present petition is VINEET GULATI 2015.09.07 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-28771 of 2015 -2treated as under Section 302, 201 and 34 IPC. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, first of all, I find that first bail application of the petitioner has already been dismissed on merit by this Court. The petitioner is named in the FIR and she is the main accused. As per the FSL report, poison was found in the Viscera of the deceased. The main allegations against the present petitioner are to the extent that her husband's brother Taranvir Singh (deceased), who came from Canada, was stated to have illicit relations with the present petitioner. As per the prosecution version, when he wanted to return to Canada, present petitioner opposed to it.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, nature and gravity of the offence and finding no changed circumstances in the present case, I do not find any merit in the present case and therefore, the same is dismissed. However, as the petitioner is in custody since 24.05.2014 and is a lady, therefore, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial by giving short adjournments.

September 03, 2015 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE VINEET GULATI 2015.09.07 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh