Adesh Chauhan v. State Of Haryana And Others
CWP-7877-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP-7877-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.03.2026 Adesh Chauhan ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present:
Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1.
Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the impugned order dated 18.07.2024 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent No.3 vide which the services of the petitioner have been terminated without conducting or holding any enquiry and without giving any opportunity of hearing. Further a writ of mandamus has been sought, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner on service.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the legal notice dated 10.11.2025 (Annexure P-12) of the petitioner is decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner.
MOHD YAKUB 2026.03.16 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
CWP-7877-2026 3.
Learned State counsel, appearing on advance notice, submits that he has no objection, in case a direction is issued to the respondent No.2 for time-bound consideration and decision of the legal notice dated 10.11.2025 (Annexure P-12) of the petitioner by passing a speaking order.
4.
Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the legal notice dated 10.11.2025 (Annexure P-12) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.2.
5.
Disposed of, accordingly.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 16.03.2026 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2026.03.16 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.