Harish Kumar Bansal v. State Of Punjab And ANR




    
       Date of decision: 30th October, 2015  Harish Kumar Bansal

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurveer Sidhu, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. None for respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ Report dated 29.09.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bathinda has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Ravi Kumar and the accused namely Harish Kumar Bansal, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.02 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in %&'(!&()*+!,',- .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2  #3$   #2&4&('5$ 36 and %7.58&(1-2 !&()* '(1 ,*-29 + !,',-  .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 

: #6$   #2&4&('5$ 

" the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.36 dated 02.03.2015 registered at Police Station Canal Colony, Bhatinda under Sections 66(1) of I.T. Act and Sections 507/295A IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

#  !
$   ;,0-26 "  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.02 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court