Manohar Lal & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ANR
Date of decision: 8th December, 2015 Manohar Lal and another Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another Respondents ! ! 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. Arun Abrol, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr. Parminder Singh0I, Advocate for respondent No.2.
!"# $ Report dated 17.09.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurdaspur has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Karnail Singh and the accused persons namely Manohar Lal and Vijay Kumar, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.
Heard.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.10 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties are co0villagers and the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of heinous nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in %&'( !&()* + !,',- .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 #$ #2&3&('4$ 5 and %6.47&(1-2!&()*'(1,*-28+!,',- .(/'0 '(1'(,*-2 9#5$ #2&3&('4$ "the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.91 dated 19.11.2014 registered at Police Station Kahnuwan under Sections 326/325/324/323/34 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.
The petition stands allowed in those terms.
# !$ -:-30-2"
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.10 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court