M/S Jagdish Trading Company v. Raj Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-713-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.08.2025 M/s Jagdish Trading Company ....applicant-appellant

Versus

Raj Kumar

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. D.N. Ganeriwala and Mr. Naman Dhull, Advocates for the applicant-appellant Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for the respondent ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present application has been preferred under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter 'Cr.P.C.') seeking grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 22.03.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dabwali, District Sirsa in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter 'NI Act'). 2.

Hon'ble the Supreme Court in M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025 SCC OnLine 1320, held that an appeal is maintainable under the proviso of Section 372 Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 413 of BNSS, 2023) against an order of acquittal passed in a complaint under Section 138 NI Act, by treating the complainant therein, as a 'victim' within the meaning under Section 2 (wa) of Cr.P.C, in view of which, the present appeal is disposed of by directing the concerned Sessions Judge, for treating it to have been filed under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. and assigning the same to the Court concerned for deciding it.

3.

Registry is directed to send the complete paper-book and trial Court record, if received, along with the said order forthwith, while also informing the parties.

28.08.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) M.Kamra JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No MOHIT 2025.08.28 19:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document