Ashok Kumar Monga & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ANR

CRM-M-28956-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28956-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 08, 2016 Ashok Kumar Monga and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.M.S.Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioners.

.......

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Challenge in this present petition, filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., is to the order dated 06.07.2015, Annexure P1, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, whereby an application filed by the petitioner in terms of Section 391, Cr.P.C., for placing on record the pleadings relating to a civil suit was dismissed.

At the very outset learned counsel fairly conceded MEENU 2016.01.12 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-28956-2015 (O&M) -2that the pleadings of civil suit proposed to be produced in additional evidence were in existence during trial and the said fact was in the notice of the petitioner and that fact was verified from the issue that the judgment relating to the same civil suit was placed before the trial Court.

When learned counsel for the petitioner was confronted with the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Rajvinder Singh vs State of Haryana, 2016(1) RCR (Criminal) 170, learned counsel fairly conceded that the issue involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment delivered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court and, as such, he would not press this petition.

Ordered accordingly.

January 08, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.01.12 12:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh