Vinay Chawla And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

Crl. Misc. No. M-29117 of 2017 [ 1 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-29117 of 2017 Date of Decision : October 06,2017 Vinay Chawla and another ..............................Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ............................. Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL ...

Present:

Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Rahul Rathore, DAG, Punjab.

...

LISA GILL, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 286 dated 20.7.2017 under Sections 323, 341, 506, 452, 34 IPC registered at Police Station Jodhewal, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana.

None for respondent No.2 despite service.

It is reiterated that the dispute in question primarily stemmed from a matrimonial dispute between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2. Petitioner No.2 is the father-in-law of respondent No.2. Proceedings under Sections 107, 151 Cr.P.C. had also been initiated in respect to the alleged incident. Learned counsel for the petitioners informs that during the pendency of this petition the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties. Petitioner No.1 and his wife-respondent No.2 are now living Rupinder Kaur 2017.10.07 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-29117 of 2017 [ 2 ] together in their matrimonial home. Therefore, this petition be allowed. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Kapil Kumar, Police Station Jodhewal, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana, verifies that respondent No.2 and petitioner No.1 are now residing together in their matrimonial home after resolving their dispute. It is informed that the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 have submitted their affidavits in this respect before the Investigating Agency. The petitioners are not reported to be involved in any other criminal case. There is no allegation that the petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts before the learned trial Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is considered just and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, in the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer.

The petitioners shall join investigation as and when required. They shall fully co-operate in the investigation of this case. Petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

( LISA GILL ) 06.10.2017 JUDGE rupi Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable:

Yes / No Rupinder Kaur 2017.10.07 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document