Ranjeet @ Sanjay v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-30112 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 14, 2018 Ranjeet @ Sanjay
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present:
Mr.N.S.Shekawat, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.
Petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.34 dated 20.01.2018 under Sections 25 and 29 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station City, Yamuna Nagar.
Notice of motion.
Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition. Mr.S.S.Rangi, Advocate appeared on behalf of the complainant and also contested the petition.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. As per the allegations, gun of the present petitioner has been VINEET GULATI 2018.08.17 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh used by his son in a murder case.
CRM No.M-30112 of 2018 -2The petitioner has been in custody since 20.01.2018. He is not required for investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. August 14, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2018.08.17 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh