← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/30050/2016disposed of

Inderjit Singh @ Raghu v. State Of Punjab

2016-10-25Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-30050 of 2016 Date of decision : October 25, 2016 Inderjit Singh alias Raghu ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. LS Sekhon, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. J.S.Brar, AAG, Punjab, for the respondent Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) The allegations against petitioner Inderjit Singh @ Raghu in this anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. are that on 6.6.2016 he along with his co-accused had assaulted the victim Hanish Kumar and Suminder Singh with baseball bats.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly placed co-accused non-applicant Sandeep Singh alias Mental and Vikas Kumar alias Cobra have already been allowed relief in this case and that only simple injury is attributed to the petitioner and thus has sought to put doubt to the very applicability of section 307 IPC. Though on behalf of the State, Mr. Brar assisted by ASI Pawan Kumar has not controverted the factual aspect but has sought to oppose the bail application.

Keeping in view the principle of parity and that the very applicability of section 307 IPC is a debatable issue, it would be traversity Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.10.25 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-30050 of 2016 -2of justice to send the petitioner behind bars, the present petition is allowed. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of arresting/investigating officer till submission of report under section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). The petitioner shall, however, join the investigation as and when called for and shall also abide by the conditions specified under section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( Fateh Deep Singh ) October 25, 2016 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.10.25 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.