Cheena v. State Of Punjab




    
       Date of decision: 5th November, 2015  Cheena  Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab  Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Siddharath Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

 !
"#  $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Cheena in case FIR No.47 dated 09.06.2015 registered at Police Station Rampura, District Bathinda under Sections 376/34 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the orders of interim bail dated 31.08.2015 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigations which is not controverted by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Lakhbir Singh who submits that the petitioner is no longer required for RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.06 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that in view of the compromise he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute.

In view of what has been stated above and in the light of orders passed earlier, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 31.08.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. #  !
$   %&'(&) "  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.06 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court