Sahil Jangra v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M-14387 of 2026(O&M) matter. Thereafter, he left her in an Auto going to Dhansu. She came to her maternal grand-mother in Fatehabad . Due to stomach ache, she was taken to Government Hospital, where she was found pregnant. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was innocent and had been falsely implicated. He was behind bars for the last 1 year and 5 months. Prosecutrix, her mother and her father were declared hostile. Therefore, considering the period of custody and evidence led by prosecution, petitioner be released on bail. 4.

Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for regular bail arguing that prosecutrix was a minor, aged 15 years, and was found pregnant. The report of DNA profiling was incriminating. In her statement under Section 183 BNSS, prosecutrix had fully supported the prosecution case. Allegations against the petitioner were serious and he did not deserve to be released on bail.

5.

At the time of alleged commission of offence, the prosecutrix was a minor, aged 15 years. She was impregnanted and from the FSL report on record, it appears that she has delivered a baby. Even though all the main witnesses have not supported prosecution case, the DNA report on record as Anenxure R-5 states that genetic profile of the baby of the victim matches with that of the petitioner. Considering the prima-facie material against the petitioner, the nature and gravity of the charge, quantum of punishment in the event of conviction, it is not a fit case to release the petitioner on regular bail.

CRM-M-14387 of 2026(O&M) 6.

Dismissed.

All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 01.06.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No