← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/18919/2021allowed

Balbir Kumar Virdi v. State Of Punjab

2021-09-17Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan2 pages

PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.09.16 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-18919-2021 (O&M) --1-- 101+207

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-29806-2021 in/and CRM-M-18919-2021 Date of Decision: 17.09.2021 Balbir Kumar Virdi Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Karambir Singh Nalwa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Grewal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. *** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

[1] Due to COVID-19 situation, the Court is convened through video conference.

[2] This petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is filed seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No. 9, dated 21st August, 2020, under Sections 7, 7(a) and 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended by the Prevention of Corruption Act, 2018) and Section 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, F.S.-1, Phase-1, Mohali, District S.A.S. Nagar. [3] The bird eye view of allegations in this case are that some transporters, passers (service providers or link between the dealers, officials) and officers of Goods & Service Tax Department, in connivance, were manipulating the transactions for availing the Input

PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.09.16 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-18919-2021 (O&M) --2-- Tax Credit (ITC) without the payment of tax. As per modus operandi, transactions were either without bills or accompanied by forged bill and using forged transportation documents.

[4] On 18th May, 2021, this Court granted interim bail to the petitioner subject to joining investigation taking note of the fact that petitioner was named in the disclosure statement. [5] Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that petitioner has joined the investigation, challan stands presented. [6] In view of statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 18th May, 2021 is made absolute.

[7] The petition is allowed.

[8] Since the main case has been decided, pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE 17th September, 2021  

1. Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes / No

2. Whether reportable :

Yes / No