Antima v. State Of Ut Chandigarh And Others

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Writ Petition No. 2840 of 2026 Date of Decision: 20.03.2026 Antima ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present:

Mr. Kanwar Kirat Singh Puri , Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Additional Public Prosecutor, U.T. Chandigarh, for the respondents No.1 to 4. Respondent No.5-Monu in person.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1.

Today the petitioner and respondent No.5 have appeared in person. The detenue has also been produced by the respondent No.5-'Monu'. It has been stated by the above named respondent No.5 that he has no objection if the custody of detenue is handed over to the petitioner, who is her mother.

2.

In response to the above-mentioned statement of respondent No.5, the petitioner has accepted the custody of child (detenue in the present petition).

3.

The statements of the respondent No.5 as well as the petitioner to the above-mentioned effect have been recorded on separate sheet. 4.

In view of above-mentioned development the learned counsel DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.03.20 20:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document for the petitioner has submitted that no cause for maintaining the present

Criminal Writ Petition No.2840 of 2026 petition survives and therefore, the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant writ petition.

5.

In view of above-mentioned submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge March 20, 2026 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.03.20 20:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document