Yadvinder Singh @ Yad And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ANR

CRM-M-29214-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29214-2015 Date of Decision: January 14, 2016 Yadvinder Singh @ Yad and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Surinder Pal Singh Tinna, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. P.S. Paul, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.

Ms. Parveen Dahiya, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Devender Singh of Police Station, Bahavwala, Tehsil Abohar, District Fazilka, submits that after investigation and taking into consideration the factum of compromise, it has been recommended for presentation of the cancellation/un-traced report, which is pending approval before the competent police authority. He further submits that after receipt of the said approval, the report under Section 173, Cr.P.C., shall be PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.01.18 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-29214-2015 presented before learned Court below.

In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this petition at this stage, to which learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. Ordered accordingly.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE January 14, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.01.18 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document