Dee Cee Singh @ Disi v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-30202 of 2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-30202 of 2018 Date of Decision: 07.12.2018 Dee Cee Singh @ Disi ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Rapton, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanvir Joshi, AAG, Punjab.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 09 dated 4.2.2018, registered under Sections 376, 120-B IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Ballianwali, District Bathinda.

As per the office report, notice issued to respondent No. 2 has not been received back served or otherwise.

Ms. Manju Goyal, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2 and has filed the power of attorney. Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 20.7.2018, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Counsel for respondent No. 2 strongly contested the petition GURPREET SINGH 2018.12.07 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-30202 of 2018 -2and submits that the petitioner and respondent No. 2 are neighbours. Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 20.7.2018 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 07, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No GURPREET SINGH 2018.12.07 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh