High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/30214/2016allowed

Rajender Kumar @ Rajender & ORS v. State Of Haryana & ANR

2016-11-03Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

Crl. Misc. No. M-30214 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30214 of 2016 Date of decision : 03.11.2016 Rajender Kumar @ Rajender & others ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and anr.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Quashing of FIR No. 343 dated 02.10.2013 under Sections 323/498-A/406/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Faridabad Old, is being sought on the basis of joint statement dated 06.10.2015 (Annexure P3 ). Respondent No. 2 got married to petitioner No. 1 on 19.02.2007. Due to temperamental differences, both the parties could not live together as husband and wife. The relationship between them became strain and thereafter, the F.I.R was registered against the petitioners on account of bringing less dowry and harassment caused by the petitioners. However, the matter has now been duly compromised, vide joint statement dated 06.10.2015 (Annexure P-3 ). In compliance of order dated 30.08.2016, report dated 03.10.2016 of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad, has been received in this regard. As per report, statement of parties have been recorded. GAURAV ARORA 2016.11.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-30214 of 2016 Complainant stated that the matter stands compromised between the parties and she does not want to proceed further against the accused and has no objection, if the present F.I.R be quashed against the petitioners. The compromise has been entered voluntarily. To the same effect is the joint statement given by the petitioners.

Consequently, in view of the status report dated 03.10.2016 and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Arvind Barsaul etc. versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 910, no useful purpose would be served in prolonging the litigation.

Accordingly, FIR No. 343 dated 02.10.2013 under Sections 323/498-A/406/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Faridabad Old, is quashed along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners.

The petition stands disposed of.

03.11.2016 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2016.11.07 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document