State Of Haryana v. Raja And ORS
CRM-A-1374-2019 (O&M) -1STATE OF HARYANA V/S RAJA AND ORS
Present:
Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, A.A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.3.
*** CRM-21777-2019 For the reasons menƟoned in the applicaƟon, delay of 215 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.
ApplicaƟon stands allowed.
CRM-A-1374-2019 Counsel for the State submits that the State has a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for convicƟon of the respondents. There is no appreciaƟon of evidence in judgment of acquiƩal dated 16.05.2018. Counsel for the private respondents opposes the prayer. Leave to appeal granted.
Registry to assign number to appeal.
Main case Heard.
AdmiƩed.
The accused i.e. respondent No. 1 to 3 to execute a bond for aƩendance within three months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. Given above, the accused-respondent No.1 to 3 shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty-Five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the saƟsfacƟon of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepƟng the sureƟes, the concerned Court must saƟsfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the peƟƟoner before the Court.
The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all sƟpulaƟons, terms, and condiƟons of this bail order. Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondent No.1 to 3 to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.
JYOTI SHARMA 2025.11.19 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh
CRM-A-1374-2019 (O&M) -2- There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and aƩest it to be a true copy. In case the aƩesƟng officer wants to verify the authenƟcity, such an officer can also verify its authenƟcity and may download and use the downloaded copy for aƩesƟng bonds. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 17.11.2025 JyoƟ Sharma JYOTI SHARMA 2025.11.19 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh