← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/14563/2026allowed

Krishan Kumar v. State Of Haryana

2026-03-20Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary3 pages

CRM-M-14563-2026 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH  CRM-M-14563-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:20.03.2026 Krishan Kumar ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.411 dated 11.10.2024, registered under Sections 22(c) and 29 of NDPS Act at Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal.

2.

Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for 1 year and 1 month. His name surfaced based on the disclosure statement of coaccused Ajay, from whom the allegedly recovery was of 1000 tablets of Tramadol (350 grams). No recovery has been effected from the petitioner. There is nothing to connect him but for that, while he was behind the bars in another case. Charges have been framed on 25.04.2025 and out of total 14 prosecution witnesses, none has been examined. He is involved in three more cases, wherein he is on bail. 3.

Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there were specific allegations against the petitioner. However, he is unable to controvert the

CRM-M-14563-2026 (O&M) 2 submissions with regard to stage of the case and the petitioner being on bail in other cases.

4.

Heard.

5.



           

  

 

 

      month 

 charges were framed on 25.04.2025;           



   



  



   



 

  



 

            



    

   !   

  

 

"

6.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

(ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of.

(v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner.

(vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty. (vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned

CRM-M-14563-2026 (O&M) 3 trial Court.

(viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court.

(ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner.

7.

It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order.

8.

In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 20.03.2026 dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No