High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/2944/2015allowed

Vandana Thomas And ANR v. Ut Of Chandigarh & ORS

2015-01-28Mr. Justice V.S. Aggarwal1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-2944 of 2015 Date of Decision:- 28.01.2015 Vandana Thomas and another ....Petitioners

Versus

Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR

Present:

Mr. Rajan Singh Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

**** MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral) Heard.

Issue notice of motion.

At this stage, Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, appears and accepts notice on behalf of official respondent Nos.1 to 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and without commenting/expressing any opinion on merits of the case or otherwise, the instant main petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners, in accordance with law. Copy of the order be given dasti.

January 28, 2015 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2011.03.05 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh