Nasib Singh v. St.Hr.

S. No.203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** RSA No.2900 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision:09.08.2024 Nasib Singh and others .....Appellants Vs.

The State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. AG, Haryana.

**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral) Civil Suit No.105 of 89/98, was decreed by the trial Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ambala City vide judgment dated 01.03.1999. The relief granted by the trial Court is as under:- "Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and discussion made above, the suit of the plainffs is decreed with costs and defendants are restrained from dispossessing the plainffs from the suit land unauthorisedly, forcibly and illegally and also restrained from effecng illegal recovery of Rs.10,674/- by any means. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. File consigned to the record room."

Surprisingly, it is the plain5ffs- appellants, who approached the Appellate Court and the said appeal was dismissed by learned Addi5onal District Judge, Ambala on 28.10.1999.

The appellants have approached this Court.

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he shall be sa5sfied in case this Court orders that the appellants shall not be dispossessed except in due course of law.

Learned State Counsel has no objec5on to grant relief to that extent. RENU 2024.08.09 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

RSA No.2900 of 2000 (O&M) -2In view of the above, the present appeal is hereby disposed of with par5al modifica5on in the impugned judgment to the extent that the appellants- plain5ffs will not be dispossessed by defendants- respondents except in due course of law. August 09, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RENU 2024.08.09 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh