Sodhi Singh v. State Of Punjab

      

 

 


 

!"

# $%&%!'(

)) *

 *

+) %%!' , - ,&.& *



 

*

)))) &/!'# '& (  01 ) *
 *- 













 

 


  
!"#


 # $

%%%%% *-  )

1 &

'
(


)

*
 "*#

$+ $,$-

)


"*


)



*

"*#

 




&$ $,&.

)

"

*
/
0
"
*


*"


/'( 1 -2

&- $,&$
"

-,4
-$,&$, 5
'0
*
 

5*



)
#
6
 




"*#




 

7"

"
 !"

$!'4%$

"" '$  ,%!# !"

& ' '$

'# "%'

%3/!& #  ,%!# !"

& ' '$ %'

# "

.5 !"

/ 63 '

!"

"%' )


* -$,
'0 (*"
##


 ₹ 
,2





3,,8 (*"
##
 


,&
#

 $ 5










 *


)

#

#
)

*
*


 ₹

*

)

#"

-3,,,,8
#
#

$$ ,+ $,,.

#*



"


"*
"


!"

"
9
 ₹ :* 
"


#"

&3,,,,8



 


"# 

"

)

"
9 

#

#

*
#"
*
 

"#

*




"*

:*




#
"*



;


 

 

#
#


"

#"
*
 

"#
)"




<#

"
 

"*


 
)"

"

#"


 "#




#





=
 *
/'(

*

"*


"
"



 "





0"
)
*

*"#
 


"

-,4
&$, 5

-$,
'0


 "*#







&$ $,&.

-

6

*


"*#


 



&$ $,&.


0"




"*

6



0"
 
7"




"

-,4

&$, 5 '0

#





"

-$,
'0


 

$+ $,$-



)

)




 



'







)

"



 






)

#


  ")#





*

#



 "*





,2
#

,+

"

 


2


)



0" 
")#
 "*
"

*

##


2& $,$-
>;"
 4?


)

)



)


 


""


*




#"

7" 
)



*



# 



 *



#"*87"*



"


-$,
-,4
'0


/'(
1
-$

&- $,&$

 5*





&$ $,&.

)



"
*
/
0
"

"*#



 $+ $,$-

)



"*


 )
#


)

##

)


 "



#"*



@
"

 



"


"*#

$. ,.

$,$&




  










 
  




 
!"
# $



 

)


@
"


#



"# 

##
*
)

)



2& $,$- >;"
 4?

*"

)
*
)


"

  

""
"

"


#
"

 )**
"


#
)




"
 

#"

7"

)




*


 #






""


"



+





"

")#

 

*
)


#"*



$+ $,$- 


)


"*


# 

"
#

#




#

 


*

#
 




 "#


##


)



##
 
2& $,$-
>;"
 4?
)

*


 #

)
*

#"

7"


*


*"#

"*
 

*








" 




)




"
 -,4
&$, 5

-$,
'0

#"*
"*#



 
&$ $,&.




#

)


) #*









7"

 "

-,4

&$, 5
'0

#




 "

-$,
'0



$+ $,$-

)
 
"*

**



 
**

#"*


"*
"

*
 ##

2& $,$-
>;"
 4?

)

)
 




#



#"*

 


)


)

##




*

7 
)
)
#



0"
**

*"
 
##

2& $,$-
>;"
 4?



 &2 ,.

$,$-


"#


##


2& $,$-
>;"
 4?



*"


)
"

)


.

'
"
)


#



B)
"#
0" 
'

 38!/

'# ',)0& $ & >"?

"


 


*
0"
"

-A$
0
*


"

6




"*#

"

"      
  
 

          ! "

 ### $ 
 
%  &  &$
   
 '
 %    $ 
   ( 
)  %  "

* 
    + 
,
 ,
 ' 

  
% "

 +
  , 

'  
 %, 
 
 
 -.

!!!/,
!. 
$  *0/# (
 1$2) 
! $ 
 % 

 (         
)  %  *-0-  3 '4
 
 56

&
()

%  
% 
-.

!! !/,
!.$,
7
 '  
!/,
!.$ 777 777 *
    
      
 
 '
 
     

    ,

 '        


    

   
     8    
 
7
 

 , 
.0$  
       

 '  8


  '



' 


   
    '

 



   
+,
 '4 '

9 


 

9
' *! 

 
 



  :


   ,  
' 

9 
  

 
 '   

 
 

 
  

     

 9
 
  '
 , '
 ,' 9 ,7


,
 '


 ,  

+ 


     7


,

 +



,
 
 

 

,
  
 
 ,
   
    
      

        7

    7 
'   ,  


.0$,    9
   
 

  , 
     
9
%

 
 
 , 
.0$' 

  
9
 ,

 
   '   
9
;  
   ,  
          

   
        
         7   
'

  '
 
  


%
&  
#'()

%

*+
"
( ) 777 777 *-<     
!# $, 
8' 
 '  


,    
 
        1   2 ,

     '  , +    7 
'   , 9
 
  
.0$  

 %
*.  

 


+ '



  
!#$ "

 ,
 , ,



       7
  ' 
     7    8




 
   
 

=(
)"     
  
'>(

) 
  
9'


'>(


)?

'   
 , 

>@(
)     
    

A    

B &,


"


)

"*#
"



 )



;


 
"

*
0"
"




-A$
0 

)
 
)

#

)"

 2$,
0
'

"
)
)

#
*
* 
"


)
"






 
)
"



#
*

 
*
"
"#




#

*
"
6" 
*
"
*




##

"
 

*
0"
"*

;
"


"

*



"#
""*



11.

The Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in case Kulwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in case Sube Singh and another vs. State of Haryana and another, 2013(4) RCR (Criminal) 102 observed that compounding of offence can be allowed even after conviction, during proceedings of the appeal against conviction pending in Sessions Court and in case of involving non-compoundable offence.
&$

In view of the judgments referred to above, perusing the report of the trial Court regarding amicable settlement between the petitioner and the complainant, this Court finds that compounding the offences will accord a quietus to all disputes between the parties and it is in the interest of both sides to bury the hatchet and lead a peaceful life. Thus, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings and in order to secure the ends of justice, the criminal proceedings in the present case deserve to be quashed by compounding the offences.

13.

Resultantly, the application for compounding the offence is allowed and judgment dated 27.02.2024, passed by learned Sessions Judge,

: Jalandhar and judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.02.2019 passed by 
"
*
/
0
", whereby petitioner was convicted under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC are set aside and petitioner is acquitted of the charges framed against him. &-

*
#"
>?






*-   ))

 

 ?

C
 *8D E81 ?

C
)D E81