Vasudha Sharma And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CM-3909-CWP-2026 AND RA-CW-135-2026 IN CWP-27272-2025 Date of decision: 18.03.2026 Vasudha Sharma and others ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Present:

Ms. Priyanka Malik, Advocate for the applicant/respondent No.3.

Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Karan Nehra, Advocate for the non-applicants/petitioners.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) RA-CW-135-2026 Prayer in the instant application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for review of the judgment dated 12.09.2025 passed in CWP-27272-2025. Learned counsel for the non-applicants/petitioners opposes the prayer made in the review application on the ground that the judgment dated 12.09.2025 passed in CWP-27272-2025 has already been implemented and no intra Court appeal has been preferred and only after the contempt petition was filed by the nonapplicants/petitioners, the applicant/respondent No.3 has filed the present review application.

MOHD YAKUB 2026.03.18 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

CM-3909-CWP-2026 AND RA-CW-135-2026 IN CWP-27272-2025 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, no ground for review is made out.

Dismissed.

Since the review application has been dismissed, the application seeking condonation of delay of 150 days in filing the review application i.e. CM-3909-CWP-2026 is disposed of having been rendered infructuous.

(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 18.03.2026 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2026.03.18 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.